... Okay, an interested reader zero'd us in on the proper Litz chart. So now we take the 3-shot 0.627" group x 1.28 = 0.8025 the estimated 5 shot group size, that was actually 0.789". Now we again take the 3-shot 0.627" group x 1.58 = 0.990" the estimated 10-shot group size, that was actually 0.899". So when anyone says 3-shot groups are stupid, tell them to multiply it times 1.28 and save the other 2 rounds for head shots. ML
415 likesajflores3d What book (manual?) is this from? 1 like
- laruetactical @ajflores3d ... Modern Advancements in Long Range Shooting, Volume 2, by Bryan Litz 6 likes
- ajflores3d @laruetactical 🔥
samuel.culper_sr 😂
engineer59 😳 math man 👍 1 like
- laruetactical @engineer59 ... Yep, been fun shootin' down an age-old internet argument. 🤓 5 likes
c12dg_llc 👍 😉
bmullis @laruetactical Thanks ML ! This is very useful information !!!
jr.hanco This is GREAT. Will be good to put out in your monthly reader "catalog".
handloadsandholdovers I like larger strings just so I can see at what point I really start to influence the dispersion due to fatigue etc versus what the rifle is actually still capable of shooting