Social Media Post

... Without luck, is it possible to get a rifle sighted dead-on at 100 yards ? *** 1/4 moa clicks vs 0.1 mil clicks. Check my math ... at 100 yards, 1/4 moa clicks = 0.2618" ... 0.1 mil clicks = 0.360". Let's call 1/4 moa clicks a 1/4" and call 0.1 mil clicks as 3/8". As an aside, did y'all follow the gun writer's of the late 60s / early 70s ... a few espoused sighting in a half inch left to curve ball 'em in. I need more coffee ☕ ML


403 likes

motocycleman12 Always showing off.

  -  laruetactical @motocycleman12 ... 😎 1 like

_esstac Try zeroing a .2mrad adjustment scope 😢

  -  laruetactical @_esstac ... Holy hell, that's 3/4 minute clicks 😳 2 likes

  -  _esstac @laruetactical vortex 1-6 scopes are like that. Zeroing is a game of "close enough" I love mils, but MOA adjustments are better for zeroing.

scot_lyn 🧠 🥘 brain food 1 like

oght6 This is why ballistic solvers have a zero offset function. 1 like

simon.deffner I think for thouse who have Yards and inches in mind, works MOA easy. For me , with meters and millimeters works MIL easier.

j0e.wheeler I personally hate the term clicks. You should know the input into your optic. At the same time. It can get so confusing communicating the proper dope that sometimes clicks is best.

jw.3392 DOPE book, zero offset, writing it in the scope, they all work. The shooter in a real environment usually can't shoot as good as his "zero group" or call wind accurate enough to make it matter. It's in the noise.

amish_tactical_ My home schooler math could be more gooder

annex.defense The @vortexoptics Razor L-Tec turrets address this-bypasses the click mechanism / increments while directly spinning the erector to your desired zero. 5 likes

expedition_jkx @laruetactical it absolutely is, you just need a scope with an adjustable zero. Unfortunately mostly only high end scopes have this kind of feature. 1 like