.jpg)
... In this day and age of ammo shortage, you can shoot 3-shot groups, then multiply the group size by 1.28 to know about what size it would be if you had flung 2 more rounds into it. I posted a pic of the Litz Conversion chart some months back. Questions ? ML
390 likesbritosalejandro_ I like seeing the rounds on paper better 1 like
- laruetactical @britosalejandro_ ... The Fun FactAR must be considered. 😎 4 likes
gregbabbitt Dem ist small little groupers Dang!!
kinetic_defense_tx Is this still considered beer math? 2 likes
- laruetactical @kinetic_defense_tx ... Litz would call it "science" 🤷 3 likes
grassblade23 I'm too OC to settle for 3 shot groups 😤 My entire spreadsheet is built around 5 shot groups
- laruetactical @grassblade23 ... You can do some simple division to see what they would have been in 3 shot groups. 🧐 2 likes
- grassblade23 @laruetactical Lol, I appreciate the math assist, but I'm gonna be mule headed and send those other two down range 🤣 2 likes
billsnearly To be statically significant, you need at least 7 7-shot groups. At least when testing lots of ammo for purchase. Ransom rest groups of course.
- laruetactical @billsnearly ... Ransom rest tells you nothing, well about the same as locking a 1911 in a Ransom Rest. The 1911's barrel indexes into the slide, where the sights are attached. The random rest is attached to the frame, which like the AR, holds the trigger and magazine and other shit that has nothing to do with accuracy. Sorry, that's the Androgel talking🤷 1 like